Skip to content

MCP servers for legal work with required secrets

Of the 391 MCP servers in the measured field of use Legal work, 52 have required secrets declared – markedly fewer than the 86 the comparison group would lead one to expect.

52 servers 0.2% of 26,983 in the directory

This category in numbers

The most frequent value per property, counted across the entries of this category. The full distribution is further down.

Entries

Filter further

Entries 51 to 52 of 52

Entries
mcp-trademarksio.github.atomno-mcp/mcp-trademarks
pro.tvarka/due-diligencepro.tvarka/due-diligence

All 52 entries in the list, with filters and pagination

What this category selects

What this category selects
Field of use, derived from the vendor descriptionLegal
derived from: Description (raw)
Required secrets declaredyes
derived from: Required secret variables (raw)

A derived value carries its original data beside it; the derivation rule is published, with a version, on the methodology page.

Caveats, distribution and query

What this category does not say

  • Field of use, derived from the vendor description is not declared but computed: from Description (raw). The rule is published, with a version, on the methodology page.
  • Required secrets declared is not declared but computed: from Required secret variables (raw), Required secret headers (raw). The rule is published, with a version, on the methodology page.

What is measured is what a manifest declares, not what a piece of software does. This registry fetches no repository URL, no endpoint and no package index; nothing here is verified. Which value comes from which source, and by which rule it was formed, is set out in the Methodology.

Every sentence here follows from the condition above, not from an assessment.

How this category is distributed

Delivery form (raw)

52
Delivery form (raw)
remote25 48 %
package23 44 %
package and remote4 7.7 %

Execution location

52
Execution location
local27 52 %
remote25 48 %

Repository URL listed

52
Repository URL listed
yes39 75 %
no13 25 %

Repository platform (raw)

52
Repository platform (raw)
github39 75 %
nothing declared13 25 %

Schema version of the raw record (raw)

52
Schema version of the raw record (raw)
https://static.modelcontextprotocol.io/schemas/2025-12-11/server.schema.json47 90 %
https://static.modelcontextprotocol.io/schemas/2025-09-29/server.schema.json3 5.8 %
https://static.modelcontextprotocol.io/schemas/2025-10-17/server.schema.json2 3.8 %

Path argument present

52
Path argument present
no51 98 %
yes1 1.9 %

Per property, the measured values inside this category. The share refers to the 52 entries of the category, not to the registry. Shown are 6 of 7 properties: those whose values spread the most inside this category.

The same category through the interface

curl -s "https://api.tracevero.com/v1/eintraege?art=mcp_server&einsatzgebiet=recht&zugangsdaten_erforderlich=true&grenze=200"

The command carries exactly the condition of this page. 52 entries at 200 each are a single request; the total is in the X-Gesamt header.

Changes to these entries

https://tracevero.com/aenderungen.atom?thema=einsatz-recht-mit-zugangsdaten

Both addresses narrow the change stream to exactly the entries in this category. The feed carries an identifier of its own, so a feed reader keeps it apart from the full stream.

Categories sharing entries with this one

MCP servers for legal work 391 entries in this category52 shared Remote MCP servers with an X-API-Key header 175 entries in this category6 shared Remote MCP servers with declared required secrets 1,491 entries in this category25 shared Remote MCP servers with an Authorization header 1,303 entries in this category18 shared MCP servers with declared required secrets 4,638 entries in this category52 shared MCP servers with required secrets and a repository URL 3,803 entries in this category39 shared

Per neighbour its own size and the counted number of shared entries. An category without a single shared entry is not listed here.

tracevero · https://tracevero.com/themen/einsatz-recht-mit-zugangsdaten?seite=2